The cost of the Iraq War, heretofore not really explained, is explained by one of the leading economists in the United States.
Trouble is, he falls into the same liberal fallacy that I think in the end insults my intelligence. There should be no if/than proposition in the argument. Are we to take seriously the assertion that we might have borrowed this much money from China and other sources to cure poverty or feed the world? I don't think so.
I'm sure there's a name for this logical fallacy, but I'm not going to look it up.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment