That's the beauty of it, so keep those cards and letters coming folks.
Anyway, I'm probably not the only one who corrected Andrew Sullivan about his naive reference to a Wall Street Journal editorial about ACORNN and supposed voter fraud, and he hasn't exactly acknowledged that it was a poor choice of citations, but he later cites the two much better discussions and links I sent him.
In my view, he stands corrected. And I'm a bit disappointed that he doesn't think admitting it would add to, not detract from, his credibility. After all, that's what he's demanding from those he criticizes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment