
Look, it's been going on so long we don't even remember anymore how ridiculous it all is. But there is a documented record. The beauty, perhaps the only beauty, of the intertubes.
A woman "of a certain age" with a certain attitude writes for others of similar persuasion. Men allowed.
AMERICA needs something new to sell to the world. I would suggest THE MOON. Sell the moon in the form of Lunar Colonization. The Military Industrial Complex is already tooled up in that direction and need only expand. REMEMBER AMERICANS are the only humans to have walked on the moon.Posted by: Mike Meyer | February 20, 2009 1:46 PM![]()
Sullivan was right. Geithner deliberately put out a weather balloon to get cover from Republs (Miss Lindsey, Greenspan) and prominent Dems for nationalization. That's why he was vague about his plans.
Had Geithner proposed nationalization, Repubs would be all over the place, crying "Marxism".
Good.
His name is Simon Johnson. I expect other people to find this stuff and pass it along to me in preferably, digestable bits, because I just don't have the smarts or the time. But I need to know. So do you.
In any case, the issue today is not whether we should nationalize. Mr Paulson effectively nationalized the liabilities of major banks without putting in place any effective supervision of banks’ operations. This is not a winning combination.
What we really need is to reprivatize - to return the banks to real private owners, preferably with strong voices on boards, and perhaps with controlling ownership stakes. And we must, above all, make sure those owners have the incentive to break the banks into smaller, more manageable pieces, none of which are “too big to fail.” As part of this process, some boards of directors will either have to go or be reshaped dramatically. And new boards can decide who should or should not run these greatly restructured banks.
The number of US women over age 55 using Facebook grew by 175.3% since September 2008, making mature females among the fastest growing demographic groups on the social network, according to statistics released by independent blog Inside Facebook.
"I thank God, I shall never again visit a slave country. To this day, if I hear a distant scream, it recalls with painful vividness my feelings, when passing a house near Pernambuco, Brazil, I heard the most pitiful screams, and could not suspect that some poor slave was being tortured ... Near Rio de Janeiro I lived opposite to an old lady, who kept screws to crush the fingers of her female slaves. I have stayed in a house where a young household mulatto, daily and hourly, was reviled, beaten and persecuted enough to break the spirit of the lowest animal...I have seen a boy, six or seven years old, struck thrice with a horse whip (before I could interfere) on his naked head, for having handed me a glass of water not quite clean. It makes one’s blood boil, yet heart tremble, to think that we Englishmen and our American descendants, with their boastful cry of liberty, have been and are so guilty," - Charles Darwin.
The programming czar at Scripps Networks, which owns HGTV and other lifestyle channels, helped inflate the real estate bubble by teaching viewers how to extract value from their homes.I mean, c'mon, some guy with a little cable power over at best a few mil. people, who probably were entertained but otherwise unable to even follow the advice, is one of the top 25. This is pathetic. This is American journalism. Okay, too inside baseball for you. I know, I know. I'm obsessed. But you heard it here first. You are not served well by any of these jokers.
Obama: I'm An Optimist -- But Not A Sap
In an interview with National Journal, President Obama said he is open to reaching across the aisle, but policy results matter. "My bottom line is not how pretty the process was," he said. "My bottom line was: Am I getting help to people who need it?" He also added: "I am an eternal optimist [but] that doesn't mean I'm a sap."
AM I crazy, or wasn’t the Obama presidency pronounced dead just days ago? Obama had “all but lost control of the agenda in Washington,” declared Newsweek on Feb. 4 as it wondered whether he might even get a stimulus package through Congress. “Obama Losing Stimulus Message War” was the headline at Politico a day later. At the mostly liberal MSNBC, the morning host, Joe Scarborough, started preparing the final rites. Obama couldn’t possibly eke out a victory because the stimulus package was “a steaming pile of garbage."
Less than a month into Obama’s term, we don’t (and can’t) know how he’ll fare as president. The compromised stimulus package, while hardly garbage, may well be inadequate. Timothy Geithner’s uninspiring and opaque stab at a bank rescue is at best a place holder and at worst a rearrangement of the deck chairs on the TARP-Titanic, where he served as Hank Paulson’s first mate.
But we do know this much. Just as in the presidential campaign, Obama has once again outwitted the punditocracy and the opposition. The same crowd that said he was a wimpy hope-monger who could never beat Hillary or get white votes was played for fools again.